CTH L over LAKE NOKOMIS
Map
Coordinates:
+45.55889, -89.7138945°33'32" N, 89°42'50" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CTH L over LAKE NOKOMIS |
Structure number: | B43066400000000 |
Location: | 1.4M N JCT USH 8 TO W |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 72.5 ft. [22.1 m] |
Total length: | 75.5 ft. [23.0 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 34.1 ft. [10.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 35.8 ft. [10.9 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1932 |
Year reconstructed: | 1982 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: July 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 3,440 [as of 2015] |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 81.1 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
July 2018 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3440 | 81.1 |
May 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 3440 | 71.1 |
May 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 3440 | 69.1 |
July 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 3200 | 80.1 |
August 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 3200 | 75.4 |
August 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 3200 | 75.4 |
July 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 3200 | 75.4 |
July 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 3200 | 64.4 |
July 2003 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 3200 | 63.4 |
July 2001 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 3200 | 64.4 |
July 1999 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 5770 | 64.4 |
September 1997 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 5770 | 62.4 |
September 1996 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 5770 | 62.4 |
October 1994 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 5770 | 62.7 |
June 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Fair | 5770 | 63.7 |