STH 29 EB over W BR SHIOC RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+44.73050, -88.4559944°43'50" N, 88°27'22" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | STH 29 EB over W BR SHIOC RIVER |
Structure number: | B58008400000000 |
Location: | 4.5M E JCT CTH T |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 68.9 ft. [21.0 m] |
Total length: | 73.2 ft. [22.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 39.4 ft. [12.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 42.7 ft. [13.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 25° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1997 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Prestressed concrete [5] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Epoxy Overlay [5] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 11,200 [as of 2015] |
Truck traffic: | 20% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Very Good [8 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 95.8 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
November 2018 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 11200 | 95.8 |
November 2016 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 11200 | 95.8 |
November 2014 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 6750 | 97.5 |
November 2012 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 6750 | 97.5 |
November 2010 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 6750 | 97.5 |
November 2008 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 6760 | 97.5 |
February 2007 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 6760 | 97.5 |
February 2005 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 6760 | 97.5 |
September 2003 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 6760 | 97.5 |
September 2001 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | - | 100.0 |
November 1999 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | - | 100.0 |
January 1997 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | - | 100.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Prestressed Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 354 | 354 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 3,111 | 3,089 | 22 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 2,891 | 2,891 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 85 | 84 | 0 | 1 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 144 | 131 | 13 | 0 | 0 |