+43.62218, -90.62923
43°37'20" N, 90°37'45" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:B62001100000000
Location:1.2M W JCT STH 131
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:100.1 ft. [30.5 m]
Total length:104.7 ft. [31.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:26.6 ft. [8.1 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1955
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Truss - Thru [10]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:108 [as of 2015]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:37.7 tons [34.3 metric tons]
Inventory rating:25.0 tons [22.7 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:61.4
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$420,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
August 201661.4FairSatisfactoryFairGoodFO108
October 201466.9FairSatisfactoryFairGoodFO100
October 201258.6FairSatisfactoryFairGoodFO100
October 201069.6FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery GoodFO100
October 200869.6FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery GoodFO100
October 200669.6FairSatisfactoryGoodVery GoodFO100
October 200469.6FairSatisfactoryGoodVery GoodFO100
October 200269.6FairSatisfactoryGoodVery GoodFO100
October 200072.6FairSatisfactoryGoodVery Good-100
June 199868.6FairSatisfactoryGoodVery GoodFO100
October 199667.1FairSatisfactoryGoodVery Good-110
May 199466.0FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery Good-110
November 199271.1FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood-70
November 199071.1FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood-70