Share:

LRD HORNBY ROAD over BR HORNBY HOLLOW CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+43.49197, -91.02947
43°29'31" N, 91°01'46" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:LRD HORNBY ROAD over BR HORNBY HOLLOW CREEK
Structure number:B62011200000000
Location:0.3M E JCT CTH N
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Total length:43.0 ft. [13.1 m]
Skew angle:40°
Owner:Town or Township Highway Agency [03]
Year built:1990
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Gravel [8]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:62 [as of 2015]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:59.3 tons [53.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:100.0

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
May 2016100.0Good7 out of 10-62
May 2014100.0Good7 out of 10-55
May 2012100.0Good7 out of 10-55
May 2010100.0Good7 out of 10-55
May 2008100.0Good7 out of 10-55
May 2006100.0Good8 out of 10-55
May 2004100.0Good8 out of 10-55
April 2002100.0Good8 out of 10-55
April 2000100.0Good8 out of 10-55
May 1998100.0Good8 out of 10-55
July 1996100.0GoodN out of 10-55
April 1994100.0Good8 out of 10-55
September 1992100.0Good8 out of 10-55
October 1990100.0Good9 out of 10-55