Share:

CTH P over WARNER CREEK

Map 

Coordinates:
+43.64755, -90.58862
43°38'51" N, 90°35'19" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CTH P over WARNER CREEK
Structure number:B62016400000000
Location:0.5M E JCT STH 131
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:46.9 ft. [14.3 m]
Total length:49.2 ft. [15.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1996
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:119 [as of 2015]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:61.1 tons [55.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:95.8

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
August 201695.8GoodGoodGoodVery Good-119
September 201499.0GoodGoodGoodVery Good-110
September 201299.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodExcellent-110
September 201099.0GoodVery GoodExcellentExcellent-110
September 200899.0GoodVery GoodExcellentExcellent-110
September 200699.0GoodVery GoodExcellentExcellent-110
September 200499.0GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-110
September 200299.0GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-110
September 200099.0GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-110
July 199899.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-110
January 1997100.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-100