Share:

CTH P over WARNER CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+43.64510, -90.56298
43°38'42" N, 90°33'47" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts

Name:CTH P over WARNER CREEK
Structure number:B62019900000000
Location:2.3M E JCT STH 131
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:46.9 ft. [14.3 m]
Total length:49.5 ft. [15.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:2001
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:107 [as of 2015]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:61.1 tons [55.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:35.6 tons [32.4 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:95.8

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
August 201695.8GoodGoodGoodVery Good-107
September 201499.9GoodVery GoodGoodVery Good-100
September 201299.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodExcellent-100
September 201099.9GoodVery GoodExcellentExcellent-100
September 200899.9GoodVery GoodExcellentExcellent-100
September 200699.9GoodVery GoodExcellentExcellent-100
September 200499.9GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-100
September 200299.9GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-100
November 200199.9GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-100