+44.02059, -89.24812
44°01'14" N, 89°14'53" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:B69000800000000
Location:2.9M E JCT STH 22
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:62.3 ft. [19.0 m]
Total length:65.3 ft. [19.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:30.8 ft. [9.4 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1983
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 18 / H 20 [4]
Main span material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main span design:Slab [01]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:606 [as of 2015]
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:66.4 tons [60.4 metric tons]
Inventory rating:23.2 tons [21.1 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:73.4
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$324,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
May 201673.4GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good-606
May 201473.4GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good-580
May 201281.4GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-580
June 201081.4GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-580
June 200881.4GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-580
May 200681.4GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-580
June 200482.5GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-380
June 200287.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-220
May 200087.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-220
May 199887.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-220
May 199687.0GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-220
May 199486.8GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-220
May 199286.8GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-220
May 199086.8GoodExcellentExcellentExcellent-244