Share:

CTH V over IH USH 51-IH 39

Map 

Coordinates:
+44.13376, -89.53226
44°08'02" N, 89°31'56" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CTH V over IH USH 51-IH 39
Structure number:B69001400000000
Location:1.3M W JCT CTH GG
Purpose:Carries highway over highway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:100.1 ft. [30.5 m]
Total length:204.7 ft. [62.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:32.2 ft. [9.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:35.8 ft. [10.9 m]
Vertical clearance below bridge:16.7 ft. [5.1 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1966
Year reconstructed:2000
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:2,200 [as of 2014]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Underclearances appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Scour condition:Bridge not over waterway. [N]
Operating rating:53.9 tons [49.0 metric tons]
Inventory rating:32.1 tons [29.2 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:76.9
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$1,067,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
June 201676.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair-2200
June 201479.7FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryFair-770
June 201291.0FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory-770
June 201091.3FairGoodGoodSatisfactory-770
June 200891.3FairGoodVery GoodSatisfactory-770
July 200691.3FairGoodVery GoodSatisfactory-770
October 200491.3FairGoodVery GoodSatisfactory-770
October 200291.3FairGoodVery GoodSatisfactory-810
August 200191.3FairGoodVery GoodSatisfactory-810
October 200091.3FairVery GoodExcellentSatisfactory-810
July 199891.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-810
October 199784.2FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-810
April 199684.2GoodGoodGoodGood-810
June 199586.2GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-810
July 199486.2GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-810
April 199386.2GoodVery GoodVery GoodGood-810
September 199286.2GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-810
August 199189.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-690