+44.17972, -89.13353
44°10'47" N, 89°08'01" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.


Structure number:B69004000000000
Location:0.1 M S JCT CTH A
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Total length:46.9 ft. [14.3 m]
Roadway width between curbs:14.8 ft. [4.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:18.7 ft. [5.7 m]
Vertical clearance above deck:12.5 ft. [3.8 m]
Owner:Town or Township Highway Agency [03]
Year built:1997
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Main span material:Wood or timber [7]
Main span design:Other [00]
Deck type:Wood or Timber [8]
Wearing surface:Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:54 [as of 2015]
Deck condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Very Good [8 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour conditions; field review indicates action is required. [4]
Operating rating:9.0 tons [8.2 metric tons]
Inventory rating:8.9 tons [8.1 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:35.9
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$217,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
May 201635.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodGoodSD54
May 201535.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodSD54
May 201435.9GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodSD50
May 201238.3GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodSD50
June 201038.3GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodSD50
July 200938.3GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodSD50
July 200838.3GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodSD50
May 200638.3GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery GoodSD50
June 200438.3GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-50
May 200238.3GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-50
November 200038.1GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-50
April 199938.1GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-50
May 199838.1GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good-50