Share:

LRD E TYLER ST over BAD RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+46.32756, -90.65558
46°19'39" N, 90°39'20" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:LRD E TYLER ST over BAD RIVER
Structure number:P02070700000000
Location:0.3M E JCT STH 13
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:29.5 ft. [9.0 m]
Total length:63.0 ft. [19.2 m]
Roadway width between curbs:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:25.3 ft. [7.7 m]
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1920
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Other [9]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:117 [as of 2015]
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3]
Sufficiency rating:47.7
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$273,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
August 2016FairFairSatisfactoryFair11747.7
August 2014FairFairSatisfactoryFair10055.8
August 2012FairFairSatisfactoryFair10055.8
August 2010FairFairSatisfactoryFair10064.6
August 2008FairFairSatisfactoryFair10064.6
August 2006FairFairSatisfactoryFair10064.6
August 2004FairFairSatisfactoryFair10064.6
August 2002FairFairSatisfactoryFair10066.6
October 2000FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory10077.6
October 1998FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory10078.6
September 1996FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood10078.6
September 1994FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory10075.0
September 1992FairFairSatisfactoryFair10063.0
August 1990FairFairSatisfactoryFair10063.0