Share:

CTH D over GILMAN VALLEY CREEK

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:CTH D over GILMAN VALLEY CREEK
Structure number:P06013700000000
Location:0.2M N JCT CTH B
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Total length:27.6 ft. [8.4 m]
Roadway width between curbs:23.0 ft. [7.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Skew angle:15°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1928
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2016

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:303 [as of 2015]
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:27.0 tons [24.5 metric tons]
Inventory rating:16.1 tons [14.6 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:56.5
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$161,000

Previous Inspections

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
September 201656.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-303
September 201456.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-280
October 201256.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-280
October 201060.7FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood-280
November 200860.7FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood-280
November 200760.7FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood-280
October 200660.7FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery Good-280
October 200460.7FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery Good-280
September 200260.7FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-280
September 200060.7FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-280
September 199860.7FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-280
March 199660.7FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-320
April 199460.2FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryVery Good-320
April 199264.2FairFairSatisfactoryVery Good-220
February 199064.2FairFairSatisfactoryVery Good-220