CTH H over S BR MANITOWOC RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+43.96167, -88.2213943°57'42" N, 88°13'17" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | CTH H over S BR MANITOWOC RIVER |
Structure number: | P08090400000000 |
Location: | 2.6M E JCT CTH C |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 6.9 ft. [2.1 m] |
Total length: | 26.9 ft. [8.2 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1968 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Steel plate (includes orthotropic) [5] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 410 [as of 2015] |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Culvert condition: | Moderate to major deterioration or disintegration, extensive cracking and leaching or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Minor settlement or misalignment. Noticeable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection in one section, significant corrosion or deep pitting. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 80.9 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2018 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 410 | 80.9 |
May 2016 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 410 | 80.9 |
May 2014 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 400 | 80.9 |
May 2012 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 400 | 77.9 |
June 2010 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 400 | 77.9 |
May 2008 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 400 | 61.7 |
March 2006 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 400 | 77.9 |
February 2004 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 400 | 77.9 |
August 2002 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 400 | 77.9 |
September 2000 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 400 | 77.9 |
January 1998 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 400 | 77.9 |
March 1996 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 400 | 89.0 |
April 1994 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 400 | 89.0 |
April 1992 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 400 | 89.0 |
November 1990 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 400 | 89.0 |