LRD CARDINAL RD over N BR PESHTIGO RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+45.68336, -88.8158945°41'00" N, 88°48'57" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | LRD CARDINAL RD over N BR PESHTIGO RIVER |
Structure number: | P21003400000000 |
Location: | 2.5M N JCT CTH G |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
Total length: | 33.8 ft. [10.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 19.0 ft. [5.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 22.3 ft. [6.8 m] |
Owner: | Town or Township Highway Agency [03] |
Year built: | 1921 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 30 [as of 2015] |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3] |
Sufficiency rating: | 51.7 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $171,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2018 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 30 | 51.7 |
August 2017 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 30 | 51.7 |
August 2016 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Poor | 30 | 51.7 |
August 2015 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 30 | 67.7 |
August 2014 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | 30 | 67.7 |
August 2012 | Fair | Fair | Good | Fair | 30 | 67.7 |
September 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 27 | 68.7 |
September 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Fair | 27 | 68.7 |
September 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 27 | 78.7 |
September 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 27 | 78.7 |
August 2002 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 27 | 78.7 |
September 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 35 | 78.7 |
October 1998 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 35 | 78.7 |
October 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 35 | 78.7 |
September 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Satisfactory | 35 | 79.4 |
September 1992 | Fair | Fair | Very Good | Satisfactory | 35 | 78.4 |
August 1990 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 35 | 78.4 |