LRD SOPER RD (CLOS over N BR OCONTO RIVER
Map
Coordinates:
+45.44033, -88.6299245°26'25" N, 88°37'48" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | LRD SOPER RD (CLOS over N BR OCONTO RIVER |
Structure number: | P21090700000000 |
Location: | 0.5M E JCT STH 32 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 32.2 ft. [9.8 m] |
Total length: | 34.1 ft. [10.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 19.0 ft. [5.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 22.3 ft. [6.8 m] |
Owner: | Town or Township Highway Agency [03] |
Year built: | 1917 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
Status: | Bridge closed to all traffic [K] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 32.0 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $171,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2018 | - | - | - | - | - | 32.0 |
August 2016 | - | - | - | - | - | 32.0 |
August 2014 | - | - | - | - | - | 32.0 |
August 2012 | Poor | Serious | Serious | - | - | 32.0 |
September 2010 | Poor | Poor | Poor | - | 20 | 32.0 |
September 2008 | Poor | Poor | Poor | - | 20 | 32.0 |
September 2006 | Poor | Poor | Poor | - | 20 | 32.0 |
September 2004 | Poor | Poor | Poor | - | 20 | 32.0 |
August 2002 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Imminent Failure | 20 | 32.0 |
September 2000 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Imminent Failure | 20 | 36.0 |
October 1998 | Poor | Poor | Serious | Imminent Failure | 20 | 32.0 |
October 1996 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Imminent Failure | 20 | 36.0 |
September 1994 | Poor | Poor | Poor | Critical | 20 | 36.0 |
September 1992 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Critical | 20 | 36.0 |
August 1990 | Poor | Fair | Satisfactory | Critical | 20 | 38.0 |