Share:

CTH EE W HAMPTON over LINCOLN CREEK

Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CTH EE W HAMPTON over LINCOLN CREEK
Structure number:P40053400000000
Location:0.2M E JCT STH 145
Purpose:Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Arterial (Urban) [16]
Length of largest span:42.3 ft. [12.9 m]
Total length:113.2 ft. [34.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:64.0 ft. [19.5 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:98.1 ft. [29.9 m]
Skew angle:40°
Owner:City or Municipal Highway Agency [04]
Year built:1956
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel continuous [4]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:19,900 [as of 2014]
Deck condition:Serious [3 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:59.3 tons [53.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:33.9 tons [30.8 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:79.9
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$935,000

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureSD/FOADT
May 201679.9PoorSeriousFairSatisfactorySD19900
May 201579.6PoorSeriousFairSatisfactorySD21371
June 201479.7PoorSeriousFairSatisfactorySD20850
June 201291.0PoorPoorSatisfactorySatisfactorySD20850
June 201090.4PoorPoorSatisfactorySatisfactorySD24900
April 200892.5FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory-24900
April 200693.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-24900
March 200493.5FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-24900
August 200293.9FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory-21900
November 200093.9FairSatisfactoryGoodGood-21900
January 199994.7FairSatisfactoryVery GoodGood-16700
July 199694.7FairSatisfactoryVery GoodSatisfactory-16700
October 199466.3PoorSatisfactoryVery GoodPoorSD16700
December 199283.1FairSatisfactoryVery GoodFair-16700
October 199083.1FairSatisfactoryVery GoodFair-16700