Share:

LRD RIVER BEND RD over PELICAN RIVER

Oneida County, Wisconsin

Map

Coordinates:
+45.59222, -89.37361
45°35'32" N, 89°22'25" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	LRD RIVER BEND RD over PELICAN RIVER
Structure number:	P43005600000000
Location:	0.5M N JCT CTH G
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Local (Rural) `[09]`
Length of largest span:	74.8 ft. `[22.8 m]`
Total length:	76.1 ft. `[23.2 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	27.9 ft. `[8.5 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	29.9 ft. `[9.1 m]`
Owner:	Town or Township Highway Agency `[03]`
Year built:	1965
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Design load:	M 13.5 / H 15 `[2]`
Main span material:	Prestressed concrete `[5]`
Main span design:	Slab `[01]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`
Wearing surface:	Bituminous `[6]`

Latest Available Inspection: July 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	177 `[as of 2015]`
Deck condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Equal to present minimum criteria `[6]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Channel protection:	Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. `[8]`
Scour condition:	Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. `[3]`
Sufficiency rating:	83.7

Previous Inspections

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
July 2018	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Good	177	83.7
May 2016	Fair	Good	Satisfactory	Good	177	83.7
May 2014	Good	Good	Good	Good	166	80.7
May 2012	Good	Very Good	Good	Good	166	89.4
August 2010	Good	Very Good	Good	Good	166	89.4
August 2008	Good	Very Good	Good	Good	166	89.4
October 2006	Good	Very Good	Good	Good	166	89.4
October 2004	Fair	Very Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	166	89.4
October 2002	Fair	Very Good	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	166	89.4
November 2000	Fair	Fair	Fair	Fair	175	77.4
September 1998	Fair	Fair	Fair	Fair	175	77.4
November 1996	Fair	Fair	Fair	Fair	175	77.4
September 1994	Fair	Fair	Fair	Fair	175	77.4
August 1992	Fair	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	Satisfactory	175	89.4
August 1990	Good	Good	Very Good	Very Good	175	89.4

© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1609674