Share:

LRD CEDAR RD over PENSAUKEE RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+44.71361, -88.34694
44°42'49" N, 88°20'49" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:LRD CEDAR RD over PENSAUKEE RIVER
Structure number:P58010100000000
Location:1.3M N JCT STH 29
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:11.5 ft. [3.5 m]
Total length:27.9 ft. [8.5 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:Town or Township Highway Agency [03]
Year built:1975
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Aluminum, Wrought Iron or Cast Iron [9]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:100 [as of 2015]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:92.5

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
June 2018Good7 out of 1010092.5
June 2016Good7 out of 1010092.5
July 2014Good8 out of 1010092.5
September 2012Good8 out of 108089.5
October 2010Good8 out of 108089.4
October 2008Good8 out of 108089.4
November 2006Good8 out of 108089.4
October 2004Good8 out of 108089.4
October 2002Good8 out of 108089.4
October 2000Good8 out of 108089.4
November 1998Good8 out of 108089.4
December 1996Good8 out of 108089.4
July 1994Good8 out of 108089.4
December 1992Good8 out of 108089.4
November 1990Good8 out of 108089.4