Share:

LRD 29TH DR over AUSTIN CREEK

Waushara County, Wisconsin

Map

Coordinates:
+44.23033, -89.03670
44°13'49" N, 89°02'12" W
View more info at Bridgehunter.com

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:LRD 29TH DR over AUSTIN CREEK
Structure number:P69001200000000
Location:1.2M N JCT CTH A
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:25.3 ft. [7.7 m]
Total length:29.2 ft. [8.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:22.6 ft. [6.9 m]
Owner:Town or Township Highway Agency [03]
Year built:1921
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Concrete [1]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:209 [as of 2015]
Deck condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Scour condition:Bridge is scour critical; bridge foundations determined to be unstable. [3]
Sufficiency rating:32.7
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$155,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
May 2018FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory20932.7
May 2016FairFairSatisfactorySatisfactory20932.7
May 2014FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory20033.8
May 2012FairFairFairSatisfactory20022.3
June 2010FairFairFairSatisfactory20022.3
July 2008FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood20077.9
May 2006FairSatisfactoryGoodGood20077.9
June 2004GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good10090.0
May 2002GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good10090.0
August 2000GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good10090.0
May 1998GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good10090.0
May 1996GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good10090.0
May 1994GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good10090.0
May 1992GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good10090.0
May 1990GoodGoodVery GoodVery Good10090.0