Share:

CTH K over PINE RIVER

Map 

Coordinates:
+44.20732, -89.20777
44°12'26" N, 89°12'28" W
Source: National Bridge Inventory
Information not verified. Use at your own risk.

Facts 

Name:CTH K over PINE RIVER
Structure number:P69090500000000
Location:1.5M N JCT CTH A
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:11.2 ft. [3.4 m]
Total length:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1973
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Corrugated Steel [6]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2016 

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,118 [as of 2015]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Operating rating:59.3 tons [53.9 metric tons]
Inventory rating:26.7 tons [24.3 metric tons]
Sufficiency rating:89.0

Previous Inspections 

DateSuff. RatingConditionCulvert ConditionSD/FOADT
May 201689.0Good7 out of 10-1118
May 201489.1Good7 out of 10-1070
May 201289.1Good7 out of 10-1070
June 201089.1Good7 out of 10-1070
July 200889.1Good7 out of 10-1070
May 200689.1Good7 out of 10-1070
June 200489.1Good8 out of 10-870
May 200289.2Good8 out of 10-750
May 200089.2Good8 out of 10-750
May 199889.2Good8 out of 10-750
May 199689.2Good8 out of 10-750
May 199489.2Good8 out of 10-750
May 199289.2Good8 out of 10-750
May 199083.2Good8 out of 10-750