County Route 27/5 over Cross Creek


+40.30218, -80.54516
40°18'08" N, 80°32'43" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:County Route 27/5 over Cross Creek
Structure number:00000000005A033
Location:0.02 mi. South jct CR 7
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Collector (Rural) [08]
Length of largest span:58.1 ft. [17.7 m]
Total length:121.1 ft. [36.9 m]
Roadway width between curbs:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:27.6 ft. [8.4 m]
Owner:State Highway Agency [01]
Year built:1996
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 22.5 / HS 25 [9]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Prestressed concrete [5]
Main spans design:Box beam or girders - Multiple [05]
Deck type:Other [9]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: June 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:264 [as of 2017]
Truck traffic:3% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Channel protection:Bank and embankment protection is severely undermined. River control devices have severe damage. Large deposits of debris are in the channel. [4]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:90.5
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$900,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
June 2018GoodGoodGoodGood26490.5
June 2016GoodGoodGoodGood28190.5
June 2014GoodGoodGoodGood25095.0
June 2012GoodGoodGoodGood25095.0
June 2010FairSatisfactoryGoodGood5090.5
June 2008GoodGoodGoodGood30090.5
July 2006GoodGoodGoodGood30090.5
July 2004GoodGoodGoodGood35090.5
July 2002GoodGoodGoodGood40090.5
July 2000GoodGoodGoodVery Good25095.0
July 1998GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good25095.0
July 1996GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good45090.5