CR 1/3 SLS over SLEEPY CREEK

This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.

Map

Coordinates:
+39.64764, -78.12867
39°38'52" N, 78°07'43" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	CR 1/3 SLS over SLEEPY CREEK
Structure number:	00000000033A003
Location:	0.35 MI E OF CR 08 SLS
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Local (Rural) `[09]`
Length of largest span:	111.9 ft. `[34.1 m]`
Total length:	262.5 ft. `[80.0 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	11.5 ft. `[3.5 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	12.1 ft. `[3.7 m]`
Vertical clearance above deck:	9.2 ft. `[2.8 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1911
Historic significance:	Bridge is possibly eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[3]`
Main span material:	Aluminum, Wrought Iron or Cast Iron `[9]`
Main span design:	Truss - Thru `[10]`
Deck type:	Wood or Timber `[8]`
Wearing surface:	Wood or Timber `[7]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Poor
Status:	Posted for load `[P]`
Average daily traffic:	200 `[as of 2011]`
Truck traffic:	9% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Serious `[3 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Poor `[4 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement `[2]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement `[2]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action `[3]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. `[7]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	13.6
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. `[31]`
Estimated cost of work:	$3,100,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
June 2014	Poor	Satisfactory	Serious	Poor	200	13.6
June 2013	Poor	Satisfactory	Serious	Poor	200	13.6
June 2012	Poor	Satisfactory	Serious	Poor	200	13.6
June 2011	Poor	Satisfactory	Serious	Poor	200	13.6
June 2010	Poor	Satisfactory	Serious	Poor	200	13.6
June 2009	Poor	Good	Serious	Poor	200	13.6
June 2008	Poor	Good	Serious	Poor	200	13.6
June 2007	Poor	Good	Serious	Poor	200	13.6
June 2006	Poor	Good	Serious	Poor	200	13.6
June 2005	Poor	Good	Serious	Poor	150	14.2
June 2004	Poor	Good	Serious	Poor	150	14.2
June 2003	Poor	Good	Serious	Poor	150	14.2
June 2002	Poor	Good	Serious	Poor	150	14.2
June 2001	Poor	Good	Serious	Poor	150	14.2
June 2000	Poor	Good	Serious	Poor	150	14.2
June 1999	Poor	Very Good	Serious	Poor	80	15.0
June 1998	Poor	Very Good	Serious	Poor	80	15.0
June 1997	Poor	Serious	Serious	Fair	500	0.0
June 1996	Poor	Serious	Serious	Fair	50	0.0
April 1995	Poor	Serious	Serious	Fair	50	0.0
June 1994	Poor	Serious	Serious	Fair	50	0.0
May 1993	Poor	Serious	Serious	Fair	50	0.0
June 1992	Poor	Serious	Serious	Fair	80	0.0
May 1991	Poor	Critical	Serious	Serious	50	15.4