COUNTY ROUTE 28/8 over SOUTH FORK HUGHES RIVER

Map

Coordinates:
+39.07509, -81.05596
39°04'30" N, 81°03'21" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	COUNTY ROUTE 28/8 over SOUTH FORK HUGHES RIVER
Structure number:	00000000043A149
Location:	0.01 M NORTH OF CR 47/11
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Local (Rural) `[09]`
Length of largest span:	124.0 ft. `[37.8 m]`
Total length:	124.3 ft. `[37.9 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	14.4 ft. `[4.4 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	16.1 ft. `[4.9 m]`
Vertical clearance above deck:	12.1 ft. `[3.7 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1907
Historic significance:	Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places `[5]`
Main span material:	Steel `[3]`
Main span design:	Truss - Thru `[10]`
Deck type:	Wood or Timber `[8]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Poor
Status:	Posted for load `[P]`
Average daily traffic:	12 `[as of 2016]`
Deck condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Serious `[3 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Fair `[5 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement `[2]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement `[2]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is `[5]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. `[7]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	18.0
Recommended work:	Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. `[31]`
Estimated cost of work:	$1,800,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
August 2018	Poor	Fair	Serious	Fair	12	18.0
August 2017	Poor	Fair	Serious	Fair	10	18.0
July 2016	Poor	Fair	Serious	Fair	10	18.0
June 2014	Poor	Fair	Serious	Fair	10	18.0
June 2013	Poor	Satisfactory	Serious	Fair	10	19.0
June 2012	Poor	Satisfactory	Serious	Fair	10	19.0
June 2011	Poor	Good	Serious	Fair	10	19.0
July 2010	Poor	Good	Serious	Fair	10	19.0
July 2009	Poor	Very Good	Serious	Fair	10	19.0
August 2008	Poor	Very Good	Serious	Fair	10	19.0
September 2007	Poor	Very Good	Serious	Fair	10	19.0
August 2006	Poor	Very Good	Serious	Fair	10	19.0
August 2005	Poor	Very Good	Serious	Fair	10	19.0
August 2004	Poor	Very Good	Serious	Fair	10	19.0
August 2003	Poor	Very Good	Serious	Fair	10	19.0
July 2002	Poor	Very Good	Serious	Fair	10	19.0
August 2000	Poor	Poor	Serious	Fair	10	17.3
July 1998	Poor	Poor	Serious	Fair	10	17.3
June 1996	Poor	Poor	Serious	Fair	10	17.3
June 1994	Poor	Poor	Serious	Fair	10	17.0
June 1992	Poor	Poor	Serious	Fair	10	17.0
October 1990	Poor	Fair	Poor	Fair	10	18.0