US 18 over Old Woman Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+43.08698, -104.3654643°05'13" N, 104°21'56" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 18 over Old Woman Creek |
Structure number: | BWX |
Location: | Lusk - Mule Creek Jct |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 75.1 ft. [22.9 m] |
Total length: | 194.9 ft. [59.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 42.7 ft. [13.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 30° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1971 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,331 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 19% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 77.7 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 2331 | 77.7 |
March 2016 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 2500 | 77.7 |
March 2014 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 1931 | 77.7 |
January 2012 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 1788 | 77.7 |
February 2010 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | 1648 | 76.9 |
March 2008 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | 1630 | 77.1 |
February 2006 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | 1620 | 77.1 |
February 2004 | Fair | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | 1650 | 76.9 |
March 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 1700 | 77.7 |
March 2000 | Fair | Satisfactory | Excellent | Satisfactory | 1730 | 78.6 |
February 1998 | Fair | Good | Excellent | Satisfactory | 1620 | 79.3 |
January 1996 | Fair | Satisfactory | Excellent | Satisfactory | 1530 | 80.0 |
January 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1500 | 81.9 |
February 1992 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1480 | 82.0 |
March 1990 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1460 | 82.2 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 960 | 960 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 11,693 | 11,693 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 8,327 | 6,905 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 6 | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 96 | 90 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 85 | 85 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Open Joint | linear ft. | 50 | 0 | 50 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Movable Bearing | each | 15 | 10 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 60 | 55 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
Fixed Bearing | each | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 1 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 20 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 390 | 0 | 390 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 1,248 | 858 | 390 | 0 | 0 |