US 16 over E Branch Wind Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+44.16414, -104.7459044°09'51" N, 104°44'45" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 16 over E Branch Wind Creek |
Structure number: | CHN |
Location: | Moorcroft - Upton |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
Total length: | 22.0 ft. [6.7 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1966 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,581 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 14% of total traffic |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Culvert condition: | Large spalls, heavy scaling, wide cracks, considerable efflorescence or opened construction joint permitting loss of backfill. Considerable settlement or misalignment. Considerable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection throughout, extensive corrosion or deep pitting. [4] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 65.9 |
Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
Estimated cost of work: | $3,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2018 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 1581 | 65.9 |
February 2017 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 3254 | 58.6 |
February 2015 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 3100 | 59.2 |
January 2013 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 1447 | 66.5 |
January 2011 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 1433 | 66.4 |
February 2009 | Poor | 4 out of 10 | 1500 | 66.1 |
February 2007 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 1530 | 83.4 |
February 2005 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 1600 | 83.2 |
March 2003 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 1430 | 83.8 |
February 2001 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 1400 | 84.0 |
February 1999 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 1380 | 93.7 |
February 1997 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 1380 | 93.7 |
March 1995 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 1300 | 93.9 |
March 1993 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 1260 | 93.0 |
January 1992 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 1200 | 93.2 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Culvert |
Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 140 | 0 | 86 | 54 | 0 |