US 16 over BN RR
Map
Coordinates:
+44.07623, -104.5894344°04'34" N, 104°35'22" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 16 over BN RR |
Structure number: | CHO |
Location: | Upton - Newcastle |
Purpose: | Carries highway over railroad |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 71.9 ft. [21.9 m] |
Total length: | 178.2 ft. [54.3 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 42.7 ft. [13.0 m] |
Vertical clearance below bridge: | 23.0 ft. [7.0 m] |
Skew angle: | 36° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1970 |
Historic significance: | Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Latex Concrete or similar additive [3] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,552 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 14% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Underclearances appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge not over waterway. [N] |
Sufficiency rating: | 93.5 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2018 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1552 | 93.5 |
March 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3254 | 88.6 |
March 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 3100 | 88.7 |
February 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1420 | 93.5 |
February 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1406 | 93.9 |
February 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1290 | 94.2 |
March 2007 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2140 | 88.8 |
February 2005 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | 1730 | 89.9 |
March 2003 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | 1690 | 90.0 |
February 2001 | Poor | Poor | Satisfactory | Good | 1550 | 90.4 |
February 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Very Good | Satisfactory | 1500 | 92.7 |
February 1997 | Fair | Good | Excellent | Satisfactory | 1510 | 92.7 |
March 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Excellent | Good | 1310 | 94.7 |
March 1993 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 1430 | 94.4 |
January 1992 | Good | Good | Very Good | Good | 1310 | 94.7 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 875 | 0 | 875 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 9,555 | 8,680 | 0 | 0 | 875 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Top Flange | sq. ft. | 7,601 | 5,465 | 2,136 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 7,601 | 5,465 | 2,136 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 130 | 110 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 94 | 88 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Strip Seal Joint | linear ft. | 53 | 0 | 53 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Movable Bearing | each | 15 | 0 | 15 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 60 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 15 |
Fixed Bearing | each | 5 | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 20 | 15 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 356 | 0 | 356 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 1,139 | 783 | 0 | 0 | 356 |