US 16 over Whoopup Creek

Map

Coordinates:
+43.76603, -104.06057
43°45'58" N, 104°03'38" W

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.

Name:	US 16 over Whoopup Creek
Structure number:	CHX
Location:	Newcastle - S Dak Line
Purpose:	Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:	Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) `[02]`
Length of largest span:	37.1 ft. `[11.3 m]`
Total length:	99.1 ft. `[30.2 m]`
Roadway width between curbs:	40.0 ft. `[12.2 m]`
Deck width edge-to-edge:	43.3 ft. `[13.2 m]`
Owner:	State Highway Agency `[01]`
Year built:	1959
Year reconstructed:	2013
Historic significance:	Historical significance is not determinable at this time `[4]`
Design load:	MS 18 / HS 20 `[5]`
Number of main spans:	3
Main spans material:	Steel continuous `[4]`
Main spans design:	Stringer/Multi-beam or girder `[02]`
Deck type:	Concrete Cast-in-Place `[1]`

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:	Fair
Status:	Open, no restriction `[A]`
Average daily traffic:	1,742 `[as of 2017]`
Truck traffic:	14% of total traffic
Deck condition:	Satisfactory `[6 out of 9]`
Superstructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Substructure condition:	Good `[7 out of 9]`
Structural appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Deck geometry appraisal:	Better than present minimum criteria `[7]`
Water adequacy appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Roadway alignment appraisal:	Equal to present desirable criteria `[8]`
Channel protection:	Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. `[7]`
Scour condition:	Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. `[8]`
Sufficiency rating:	81.3
Recommended work:	Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. `[38]`
Estimated cost of work:	$71,000

Date	Condition	Deck	Superstructure	Substructure	ADT	Suff. Rating
August 2018	Fair	Satisfactory	Good	Good	1742	81.3
January 2017	Good	Very Good	Good	Good	1544	82.7
January 2015	Good	Very Good	Good	Good	1471	83.3
January 2013	Poor	Critical	Satisfactory	Good	1402	77.8
January 2011	Poor	Critical	Satisfactory	Good	1388	77.9
January 2009	Poor	Critical	Satisfactory	Good	1390	77.9
March 2007	Poor	Serious	Satisfactory	Good	1150	79.8
February 2005	Poor	Serious	Satisfactory	Good	1350	78.2
March 2003	Poor	Poor	Satisfactory	Good	1320	80.7
February 2001	Poor	Poor	Excellent	Good	1250	81.2
March 1999	Fair	Satisfactory	Fair	Good	1230	70.3
February 1997	Fair	Fair	Excellent	Good	1230	81.6
March 1995	Fair	Satisfactory	Excellent	Good	1210	70.4
March 1993	Good	Good	Very Good	Good	970	73.6
January 1992	Good	Good	Very Good	Good	800	76.1

Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.

Element	Units	Quantity	1-Good	2-Fair	3-Poor	4-Serious
Superstructure
Steel Girder/Beam	linear ft.	483	483	0	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	3,539	3,539	0	0	0
Deck
Reinforced Concrete Deck	sq. ft.	4,356	1,552	2,182	622	0
Substructure
Reinforced Concrete Column	each	6	0	6	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Abutment	linear ft.	110	110	0	0	0
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap	linear ft.	82	82	0	0	0
Joints
Compression Joint	linear ft.	89	84	5	0	0
Bearings
Elastomeric Bearing	each	4	4	0	0	0
Movable Bearing	each	12	12	0	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	48	48	0	0	0
Fixed Bearing	each	4	4	0	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	16	16	0	0	0
Bridge Rail
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail	linear ft.	299	299	0	0	0
Steel Protective Coating	sq. ft.	955	955	0	0	0