County Road 1 over N Fork Owl Creek


+43.68912, -108.84244
43°41'21" N, 108°50'33" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:County Road 1 over N Fork Owl Creek
Structure number:DJH
Location:14 Mi Sw Of Hamilton Dome
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:40.0 ft. [12.2 m]
Total length:43.0 ft. [13.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:28.5 ft. [8.7 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1978
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]

Latest Available Inspection: May 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:276 [as of 2017]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:81.1
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$7,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
May 2018FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood27681.1
February 2016FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood78069.3
February 2014FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood78069.3
February 2012FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood78067.5
February 2010FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood77069.1
March 2008FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood71077.1
March 2006FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood3088.5
March 2004FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood3088.5
February 2002FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood3088.5
March 2000GoodGoodGoodGood3088.5
March 1998GoodGoodGoodGood3088.5
March 1996GoodGoodGoodGood3088.5
March 1994GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3088.5
April 1992GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3088.5
June 1990GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3088.5