US 20 over Van Tassell Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+42.66077, -104.0661142°39'39" N, 104°03'58" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 20 over Van Tassell Creek |
Structure number: | FDZ |
Location: | Lusk - Nebr. Line |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 35.1 ft. [10.7 m] |
Total length: | 94.2 ft. [28.7 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 39.0 ft. [11.9 m] |
Skew angle: | 40° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1986 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 428 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 25% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 96.8 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 428 | 96.8 |
April 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 389 | 97.0 |
March 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 432 | 96.7 |
February 2011 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 443 | 99.5 |
January 2009 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 460 | 99.5 |
January 2007 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 470 | 99.5 |
February 2005 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 500 | 99.5 |
February 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 500 | 99.5 |
February 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 520 | 99.5 |
February 1999 | Good | Good | Excellent | Good | 490 | 97.5 |
February 1997 | Good | Good | Excellent | Good | 450 | 97.5 |
March 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Excellent | Good | 450 | 97.5 |
May 1993 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 430 | 97.5 |
March 1991 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 400 | 97.6 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 459 | 459 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 2,809 | 2,809 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 3,666 | 3,346 | 320 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 3,384 | 3,384 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 103 | 100 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Pile | each | 10 | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 400 | 220 | 0 | 0 | 180 |
Steel Pier Cap | linear ft. | 95 | 95 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 667 | 667 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 78 | 78 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 10 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 262 | 130 | 131 | 1 | 0 |
Concrete Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 1,499 | 1,349 | 0 | 0 | 150 |