US 18 over Old Woman Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+43.24715, -104.2930843°14'50" N, 104°17'35" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 18 over Old Woman Creek |
Structure number: | FEW |
Location: | Lusk - Newcastle |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 56.1 ft. [17.1 m] |
Total length: | 145.0 ft. [44.2 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 40.0 ft. [12.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 43.0 ft. [13.1 m] |
Skew angle: | 10° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1987 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Steel continuous [4] |
Main spans design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Latex Concrete or similar additive [3] |
Latest Available Inspection: April 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,082 [as of 2016] |
Truck traffic: | 18% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 74.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
April 2017 | Fair | Fair | Good | Good | 2082 | 74.0 |
September 2015 | Fair | Fair | Good | Good | 2118 | 74.0 |
September 2013 | Fair | Fair | Good | Good | 1703 | 74.0 |
August 2011 | Fair | Fair | Good | Good | 1792 | 74.0 |
July 2009 | Fair | Fair | Good | Good | 1630 | 74.0 |
September 2007 | Fair | Fair | Good | Good | 1650 | 74.0 |
September 2005 | Fair | Fair | Good | Good | 1650 | 74.0 |
September 2003 | Fair | Fair | Good | Good | 1760 | 74.0 |
September 2001 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 1720 | 75.0 |
August 1999 | Fair | Satisfactory | Excellent | Good | 1580 | 75.5 |
September 1997 | Fair | Satisfactory | Excellent | Good | 1670 | 75.0 |
August 1995 | Fair | Satisfactory | Excellent | Good | 1450 | 76.6 |
September 1993 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1460 | 76.5 |
November 1991 | Good | Good | Very Good | Very Good | 1420 | 76.8 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 720 | 720 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 6,736 | 6,664 | 0 | 0 | 72 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 6,235 | 5,676 | 520 | 39 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 5,800 | 0 | 5,794 | 6 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 6 | 4 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 129 | 127 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 82 | 82 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Joints |
Pourable Joint | linear ft. | 82 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 82 |
Bearings |
Elastomeric Bearing | each | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 404 | 181 | 220 | 3 | 0 |
Concrete Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 2,205 | 1,874 | 0 | 0 | 331 |