US-18 over Mule Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+43.36636, -104.2321543°21'59" N, 104°13'56" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US-18 over Mule Creek |
Structure number: | FGP |
Location: | Lusk-Newcastle |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
Total length: | 24.6 ft. [7.5 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1988 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: March 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 2,458 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 14% of total traffic |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
Culvert condition: | Moderate to major deterioration or disintegration, extensive cracking and leaching or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Minor settlement or misalignment. Noticeable scouring or erosion at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have significant distortion and deflection in one section, significant corrosion or deep pitting. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 54.0 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
March 2018 | Fair | 5 out of 10 | 2458 | 54.0 |
April 2016 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 2082 | 65.0 |
April 2014 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1703 | 80.3 |
June 2012 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1683 | 80.5 |
April 2010 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1648 | 80.7 |
June 2008 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1630 | 80.9 |
April 2006 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1650 | 80.7 |
April 2004 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1650 | 80.7 |
April 2002 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1700 | 80.3 |
April 2000 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 1720 | 80.2 |
February 1998 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 1580 | 80.2 |
January 1996 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 1450 | 81.2 |
February 1994 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 1460 | 81.2 |
March 1992 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 1440 | 81.3 |
April 1990 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 1420 | 81.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Culvert |
Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 176 | 174 | 1 | 1 | 0 |