Share:

W Pershing Street over Niobrara River

Map

Coordinates:
+42.76741, -104.46328
42°46'03" N, 104°27'48" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:W Pershing Street over Niobrara River
Structure number:FVC
Location:Lusk Streets
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:9.8 ft. [3.0 m]
Total length:31.8 ft. [9.7 m]
Owner:Other State Agencies [21]
Year built:1991
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:MS 18 / HS 20 [5]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Concrete Precast Panels [2]

Latest Available Inspection: April 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:139 [as of 2017]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:93.7
Recommended work:Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38]
Estimated cost of work:$33,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
April 2018Good7 out of 1013993.7
April 2016Good7 out of 1020087.0
February 2014Good7 out of 1020091.1
April 2012Good7 out of 1020091.1
April 2010Good7 out of 1020091.7
April 2008Good7 out of 1020091.7
March 2006Good7 out of 102091.7
April 2004Good7 out of 102091.7
March 2002Good7 out of 102091.7
April 2000Good7 out of 102091.7
April 1998Good7 out of 102091.7
May 1996Good7 out of 102091.7
April 1994Good7 out of 102091.7
January 1992Good7 out of 102091.7