US 85 over Robbers Roost Creek
Map
Coordinates:
+43.46978, -104.2046943°28'11" N, 104°12'17" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | US 85 over Robbers Roost Creek |
Structure number: | JOH |
Location: | Mule Creek Jct-Newcastle |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Principal Arterial - Other (Rural) [02] |
Length of largest span: | 9.8 ft. [3.0 m] |
Total length: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 162.1 ft. [49.4 m] |
Skew angle: | 30° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1992 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: June 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,099 [as of 2017] |
Truck traffic: | 14% of total traffic |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Culvert condition: | Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 86.8 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
June 2018 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1099 | 86.8 |
February 2017 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 1039 | 87.3 |
February 2015 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 925 | 88.1 |
January 2013 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 974 | 87.7 |
February 2011 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 777 | 89.2 |
February 2009 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 860 | 88.6 |
February 2007 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 830 | 88.8 |
February 2005 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 840 | 88.7 |
March 2003 | Fair | 6 out of 10 | 920 | 88.1 |
March 2001 | Good | 9 out of 10 | 850 | 88.7 |
March 1999 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 800 | 87.0 |
February 1997 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 800 | 87.0 |
March 1995 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 760 | 86.4 |
November 1992 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 780 | 79.5 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Culvert |
Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 324 | 185 | 136 | 3 | 0 |