Share: 
BACK CREEK ROAD over BACK CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+37.69417, -84.49306
37°41'39" N, 84°29'35" W
+37.69417, -84.49306
37°41'39" N, 84°29'35" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | BACK CREEK ROAD over BACK CREEK |
| Structure number: | 040C00066N |
| Location: | 50 FT E TEATERSVILLE RD |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
| Length of largest span: | 12.1 ft. [3.7 m] |
| Total length: | 55.1 ft. [16.8 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 14.1 ft. [4.3 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 14.1 ft. [4.3 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1970 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 4 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Slab [01] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Posted for load [P] |
| Average daily traffic: | 103 [as of 2013] |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 55.1 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| November 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Satisfactory | 103 | 55.1 |
| February 2016 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 103 | 55.1 |
| November 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 103 | 58.1 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Substructure | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Pier Wall | linear ft. | 42 | 0 | 42 | 0 | 0 |
| Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 28 | 28 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Deck | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Slab | sq. ft. | 770 | 512 | 254 | 4 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1671965
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1671965