Share: 
Poppasquash Rd over Tidal Inlet
Map
Coordinates:
+41.68014, -71.28179
41°40'48" N, 71°16'54" W
+41.68014, -71.28179
41°40'48" N, 71°16'54" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | Poppasquash Rd over Tidal Inlet |
| Structure number: | 000000000002930 |
| Location: | 0.3 Mi W of JCT RI 114 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
| Length of largest span: | 5.9 ft. [1.8 m] |
| Total length: | 23.3 ft. [7.1 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 20.0 ft. [6.1 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 33.5 ft. [10.2 m] |
| Skew angle: | 29° |
| Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
| Year built: | 1920 |
| Year reconstructed: | 2013 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Other [9] |
Latest Available Inspection: November 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,313 [as of 2015] |
| Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
| Culvert condition: | Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 71.9 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $461,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| November 2018 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 1313 | 71.9 |
| March 2017 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 1313 | 71.9 |
| March 2015 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 1313 | 71.9 |
| April 2013 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 1700 | 71.9 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culvert | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 111 | 108 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 466 | 466 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bridge Rail | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 44 | 44 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1677512
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1677512