Share: 
ROADWAY over INTERMITTENT STRM
Map
Coordinates:
+19.64958, -155.95499
19°38'58" N, 155°57'18" W
+19.64958, -155.95499
19°38'58" N, 155°57'18" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | ROADWAY over INTERMITTENT STRM |
| Structure number: | 001001800700604 |
| Location: | TMK:7-5-11 HIENALOLI CUL |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over relief for waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Rural) [06] |
| Length of largest span: | 8.9 ft. [2.7 m] |
| Total length: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 22.6 ft. [6.9 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 24.0 ft. [7.3 m] |
| Skew angle: | 19° |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1972 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 2 |
| Main spans material: | Concrete continuous [2] |
| Main spans design: | Culvert [19] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 1,728 [as of 1984] |
| Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Superior to present desirable criteria [9] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Culvert condition: | Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 66.6 |
| Recommended work: | Other structural work, including hydraulic replacements. [38] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $166,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 2018 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 1728 | 66.6 |
| February 2016 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 1728 | 66.6 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Culvert | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 48 | 34 | 13 | 1 | 0 |
| Bridge Rail | ||||||
| Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 20 | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1684358
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1684358