U.S. 67 SERVICE RD over McKINNEY BAYOU
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | U.S. 67 SERVICE RD over McKINNEY BAYOU |
Structure number: | 000000000001199 |
Location: | 1.03 MI. SO. OF S.H. 108 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 34.5 ft. [10.5 m] |
Total length: | 103.0 ft. [31.4 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 26.9 ft. [8.2 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 29.9 ft. [9.1 m] |
Skew angle: | 30° |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1929 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 3 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Tee beam [04] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: December 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 1,800 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 83.8 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
December 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1800 | 83.8 |
December 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1800 | 80.9 |
December 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 1800 | 80.9 |
December 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 50 | 93.1 |
December 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 2500 | 61.3 |
December 2007 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 22 | 76.7 |
October 2005 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 15 | 76.7 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 515 | 513 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 3,090 | 3,090 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 80 | 80 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Prestressed Concrete Pile | each | 10 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 140 | 137 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Reinforced Concrete Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 206 | 206 | 0 | 0 | 0 |