Old Hwy 65 over Batesville Creek


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:Old Hwy 65 over Batesville Creek
Structure number:000000000002025
Location:1.0 MI S OF DAMASCUS
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:35.1 ft. [10.7 m]
Total length:141.1 ft. [43.0 m]
Roadway width between curbs:26.9 ft. [8.2 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:32.5 ft. [9.9 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1940
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:4
Main spans material:Concrete [1]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:7,000 [as of 1998]
Truck traffic:17% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:62.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$448,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
August 2018FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory700062.0
August 2016FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory700062.0
August 2014FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory700062.0
August 2012FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory700062.0
August 2010FairSatisfactoryGoodGood700062.0
September 2008FairSatisfactoryGoodGood700042.7
August 2006FairSatisfactoryGoodGood700042.7
September 2004GoodGoodGoodGood700042.7
July 2002GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good700042.5
August 2000GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good700042.5
August 1998GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good700042.5
September 1996GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good695042.5
July 1994GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good695042.5
August 1992GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good330545.6
August 1990GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good439442.5