SH 60 over Earl Branch
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SH 60 over Earl Branch |
Structure number: | 000000000002221 |
Location: | 1.8 M N of Perry Co Line |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 36.1 ft. [11.0 m] |
Total length: | 49.9 ft. [15.2 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1949 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Main span material: | Concrete [1] |
Main span design: | Culvert [19] |
Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 460 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Culvert condition: | Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 79.5 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Culvert Condition | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2018 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 460 | 79.5 |
July 2016 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 380 | 79.5 |
July 2014 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 380 | 79.5 |
August 2012 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 540 | 75.5 |
July 2010 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 540 | 75.5 |
August 2008 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 540 | 75.5 |
August 2006 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 670 | 75.4 |
September 2004 | Good | 7 out of 10 | 600 | 75.4 |
July 2002 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 550 | 75.3 |
September 2000 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 620 | 75.2 |
July 1998 | Good | 8 out of 10 | 620 | 75.2 |
September 1996 | Good | N out of 10 | 335 | 76.4 |
July 1994 | Good | N out of 10 | 335 | 76.4 |
September 1992 | Good | N out of 10 | 335 | 76.4 |
July 1990 | Good | N out of 10 | 524 | 75.3 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Culvert |
Reinforced Concrete Culvert | linear ft. | 48 | 40 | 8 | 0 | 0 |