Share:

Cr-624/Z-I/L-1.87 over Ditch

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:Cr-624/Z-I/L-1.87 over Ditch
Structure number:000000000015767
Location:0.6 Mi W Jct Cr 241 & 624
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:21.0 ft. [6.4 m]
Total length:61.0 ft. [18.6 m]
Roadway width between curbs:18.7 ft. [5.7 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1930
Year reconstructed:1997
Historic significance:Bridge is on the National Register of Historic Places [1]
Number of main spans:3
Main spans material:Steel [3]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Other [9]
Wearing surface:Other [9]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:32 [as of 1987]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Pier/abutment protection:Navigation protection not required [1]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:42.0
Recommended work:Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31]
Estimated cost of work:$314,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
September 2018PoorGoodGoodPoor3242.0
September 2017PoorGoodGoodPoor3242.0
September 2016FairFairSatisfactoryFair3254.7
September 2015FairFairSatisfactoryFair3254.7
September 2014FairFairSatisfactoryFair3254.7
September 2013FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory3246.3
September 2012FairGoodGoodSatisfactory3246.3
September 2011FairGoodGoodSatisfactory3246.3
September 2010FairGoodVery GoodSatisfactory3246.3
September 2009GoodGoodVery GoodGood3246.3
August 2008GoodGoodVery GoodGood3246.3
September 2007GoodGoodVery GoodGood3246.3
September 2006GoodGoodVery GoodGood3246.3
July 2005GoodGoodVery GoodGood3246.3
August 2004GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3246.3
June 2003GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3246.3
June 2002GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3246.3
June 2001GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3246.3
June 2000GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3246.3
June 1999GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3246.3
June 1998GoodVery GoodVery GoodVery Good3246.3
March 1997FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood3235.4
December 1995FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood3230.6
November 1994FairSatisfactorySatisfactoryGood3230.6
November 1993FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory3240.3
December 1992FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory3240.3
October 1991FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory3240.3