CR 16/Nelsonville over S BIG CREEK RELIEF

This bridge is no longer in the current National Bridge Inventory database, and has likely been demolished or abandoned.


+36.03000, -91.39500
36°01'48" N, 91°23'42" W


Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:CR 16/Nelsonville over S BIG CREEK RELIEF
Structure number:000000000018273
Location:1.68 N SH 115
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Major Collector (Rural) [07]
Length of largest span:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Total length:29.9 ft. [9.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:24.0 ft. [7.3 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:26.2 ft. [8.0 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1938
Historic significance:Historical significance is not determinable at this time [4]
Main span material:Steel [3]
Main span design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: February 2014

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Posted for load [P]
Average daily traffic:73 [as of 1987]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Satisfactory [6 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:43.3
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
February 2014FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory7343.3
February 2013FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory7343.3
March 2012FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory7340.9
March 2011FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory7340.9
March 2010FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory7340.9
March 2009FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory7340.9
March 2007FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory7340.9
February 2006FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory7340.9
January 2005FairGoodSatisfactorySatisfactory7340.9
March 2003FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory7340.9
April 2002FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory7340.9
May 2001FairSatisfactorySatisfactorySatisfactory7340.9
April 2000GoodGoodGoodGood7340.9
February 1999GoodGoodGoodGood7340.9
February 1998GoodGoodGoodGood7340.9
March 1996GoodGoodGoodGood7340.9
March 1995GoodGoodGoodGood7340.9
March 1994GoodGoodGoodGood7340.9
March 1993GoodGoodGoodGood7340.9
February 1992GoodGoodGoodGood7340.9