SH 28 over HOPPER CREEK
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SH 28 over HOPPER CREEK |
Structure number: | 0000000000M0695 |
Location: | 13.9 M E OF SCOTT COL |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Major Collector (Rural) [07] |
Length of largest span: | 19.0 ft. [5.8 m] |
Total length: | 38.1 ft. [11.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 24.3 ft. [7.4 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 25.3 ft. [7.7 m] |
Owner: | State Highway Agency [01] |
Year built: | 1963 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | M 13.5 / H 15 [2] |
Number of main spans: | 2 |
Main spans material: | Concrete [1] |
Main spans design: | Channel beam [22] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: May 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 440 [as of 2014] |
Truck traffic: | 1% of total traffic |
Deck condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
Pier/abutment protection: | Navigation protection not required [1] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
Sufficiency rating: | 85.9 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
May 2018 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 440 | 85.9 |
May 2016 | Fair | Good | Good | Satisfactory | 380 | 86.9 |
April 2014 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 380 | 75.9 |
May 2012 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 600 | 74.8 |
May 2010 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 600 | 74.8 |
April 2008 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 600 | 54.4 |
June 2006 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 610 | 54.4 |
April 2004 | Fair | Good | Good | Fair | 510 | 54.5 |
April 2002 | Fair | Very Good | Very Good | Fair | 600 | 54.3 |
April 2000 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 480 | 65.3 |
May 1998 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 480 | 65.3 |
June 1996 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 250 | 70.9 |
June 1994 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 250 | 70.9 |
June 1992 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 250 | 70.9 |
May 1990 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 589 | 63.8 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Reinforced Concrete Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 266 | 266 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 957 | 957 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 957 | 622 | 335 | 0 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Column | each | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 50 | 40 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
Reinforced Concrete Pier Cap | linear ft. | 25 | 24 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 76 | 76 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 228 | 228 | 0 | 0 | 0 |