SALT CREEK RD over SALT CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+41.55393, -124.0614141°33'14" N, 124°03'41" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | SALT CREEK RD over SALT CREEK |
Structure number: | 01C0020 |
Location: | 0.1 MI N/O REQUA RD |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 49.9 ft. [15.2 m] |
Total length: | 52.2 ft. [15.9 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 12.5 ft. [3.8 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 13.1 ft. [4.0 m] |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1975 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
Deck type: | Wood or Timber [8] |
Wearing surface: | Wood or Timber [7] |
Latest Available Inspection: August 2018
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Poor |
Status: | Posted for load [P] |
Average daily traffic: | 5 [as of 2004] |
Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Poor [4 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4] |
Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 40.5 |
Recommended work: | Replacement of bridge or other structure because of substandard load carrying capacity or substantial bridge roadway geometry. [31] |
Estimated cost of work: | $247,000 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
August 2018 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Good | 5 | 40.5 |
August 2016 | Poor | Fair | Poor | Good | 5 | 40.5 |
August 2014 | Poor | Satisfactory | Poor | Very Good | 5 | 41.5 |
August 2012 | Poor | Satisfactory | Fair | Poor | 5 | 41.5 |
August 2010 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 5 | 53.1 |
October 2008 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 5 | 53.1 |
November 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 5 | 53.1 |
February 2006 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 5 | 53.1 |
September 2004 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 5 | 53.1 |
June 2003 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Satisfactory | 30 | 52.7 |
July 2002 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 30 | 63.8 |
August 2001 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 30 | 62.8 |
August 2000 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 30 | 62.8 |
May 1997 | Fair | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 30 | 62.8 |
July 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 30 | 21.4 |
August 1992 | Fair | Satisfactory | Fair | Good | 30 | 21.6 |