Share:

COUNTY ROAD 215 over HOWARDS GULCH

Map

Coordinates:
+41.47651, -120.95262
41°28'35" N, 120°57'09" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:COUNTY ROAD 215 over HOWARDS GULCH
Structure number:03C0077
Location:4.2 MI N OF SH 299
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Rural) [09]
Length of largest span:11.8 ft. [3.6 m]
Total length:25.9 ft. [7.9 m]
Skew angle:30°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1931
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: August 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:32 [as of 2012]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Culvert condition:Deterioration or initial disintegration, minor chloride contamination, cracking with some leaching, or spalls on concrete or masonry walls and slabs. Local minor scouring at curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth curvature, non-symmetrical shape, significant corrosion or moderate pitting. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:74.8

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
August 2017Fair6 out of 103274.8
September 2015Fair6 out of 103574.8
September 2013Good8 out of 103574.8
August 2011Good8 out of 103574.8
September 2009Good8 out of 102074.8
October 2007Good8 out of 102089.8
September 2005Good8 out of 102089.8
August 2003Good8 out of 102089.8
April 2002Good8 out of 102089.8
November 2000Good8 out of 102089.8
August 1997Good8 out of 102089.8
September 1995Good8 out of 102089.8
July 1993Fair6 out of 102082.6
May 1991Fair6 out of 102082.6