Share:

CASCADE BLVD over MOODY CREEK

Map

Coordinates:
+40.68175, -122.34933
40°40'54" N, 122°20'58" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:CASCADE BLVD over MOODY CREEK
Structure number:06C0060
Location:0.1 MI N SR 151
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Local (Urban) [19]
Length of largest span:20.0 ft. [6.1 m]
Total length:41.7 ft. [12.7 m]
Roadway width between curbs:21.0 ft. [6.4 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:23.6 ft. [7.2 m]
Skew angle:25°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1918
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Design load:M 13.5 / H 15 [2]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Tee beam [04]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: September 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Fair
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,000 [as of 2013]
Truck traffic:10% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Fair [5 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3]
Water adequacy appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:58.9
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$147,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
September 2017FairGoodFairGood100058.9
September 2015GoodGoodGoodGood100069.9
September 2013GoodGoodGoodGood100071.7
September 2011GoodGoodGoodGood100071.7
September 2009GoodGoodGoodGood100071.7
September 2007GoodGoodGoodGood100074.0
February 2006GoodGoodGoodGood100074.0
May 2004GoodGoodGoodGood100074.0
March 2003FairSatisfactoryGoodGood100074.0
November 2000FairSatisfactoryGoodGood100074.0
August 1997GoodGoodGoodGood100074.0
May 1995FairFairFairFair100061.8
February 1993FairFairFairFair100061.8
April 1990PoorFairPoorPoor100046.7