Share: 
LOWREY ROAD over MIDDLE FORK ELDER CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+40.00876, -122.55719
40°00'32" N, 122°33'26" W
+40.00876, -122.55719
40°00'32" N, 122°33'26" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | LOWREY ROAD over MIDDLE FORK ELDER CREEK |
| Structure number: | 08C0267 |
| Location: | 9.95 MI N PASKENTA ROAD |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
| Length of largest span: | 80.1 ft. [24.4 m] |
| Total length: | 84.0 ft. [25.6 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 20.3 ft. [6.2 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 20.3 ft. [6.2 m] |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1942 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | M 18 / H 20 [4] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Truss - Thru [10] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: February 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 500 [as of 2007] |
| Truck traffic: | 10% of total traffic |
| Deck condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Fair [5 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Somewhat better than minimum adequacy to tolerate being left in place as is [5] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Basically intolerable requiring high priority of corrrective action [3] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is in need of minor repairs. River control devices and embankment protection have a little minor damage. Banks and/or channel have minor amounts of drift. [7] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 51.0 |
| Recommended work: | Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35] |
| Estimated cost of work: | $265,000 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| February 2017 | Fair | Fair | Fair | Good | 500 | 51.0 |
| February 2015 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 500 | 63.5 |
| February 2013 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 500 | 53.9 |
| May 2011 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 500 | 53.9 |
| March 2009 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 500 | 53.9 |
| January 2007 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 500 | 46.4 |
| January 2004 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 300 | 49.5 |
| April 2002 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 300 | 49.5 |
| July 2000 | Fair | Good | Fair | Good | 300 | 49.5 |
| April 1997 | Fair | Good | Satisfactory | Good | 300 | 60.9 |
| July 1994 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 300 | 60.7 |
| March 1993 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 300 | 72.3 |
| February 1991 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | 300 | 72.3 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1040026
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1040026