Share:

DIXON LANE over BISHOP CREEK BYPASS CNL

Map

Coordinates:
+37.39033, -118.42557
37°23'25" N, 118°25'32" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:DIXON LANE over BISHOP CREEK BYPASS CNL
Structure number:48C0043
Location:0.2 MI E BROCKMAN LANE
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Minor Collector (Rural) [08]
Length of largest span:14.1 ft. [4.3 m]
Total length:33.1 ft. [10.1 m]
Roadway width between curbs:39.7 ft. [12.1 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:41.7 ft. [12.7 m]
Skew angle:22°
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1983
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:2
Main spans material:Concrete continuous [2]
Main spans design:Culvert [19]
Deck type:Not applicable [N]

Latest Available Inspection: July 2018

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Good
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:1,200 [as of 2017]
Truck traffic:2% of total traffic
Structural appraisal:Better than present minimum criteria [7]
Deck geometry appraisal:Equal to present minimum criteria [6]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8]
Culvert condition:Shrinkage cracks, light scaling and insignificant spalling which does not expose reinforcing steel. Insignificant damage caused by drift with no misalignment and not requiring corrective action. Some minor scouring has occured near curtain walls, wingwalls or pipes. Metal culverts have a smooth symmetrical curvature with superficial corrosion and no pitting. [7]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8]
Sufficiency rating:99.9

Previous Inspections

DateConditionCulvert ConditionADTSuff. Rating
July 2018Good7 out of 10120099.9
July 2014Good8 out of 10120099.9
July 2012Good8 out of 10120099.9
July 2010Good8 out of 10120099.9
July 2008Good8 out of 10120099.9
July 2006Good8 out of 10120099.9
May 2004Good8 out of 10120099.9
March 2002Good8 out of 10120099.9
March 2000Good8 out of 10120099.9
August 1996Good9 out of 10120099.9
August 1994Good9 out of 10120099.9
August 1992Good9 out of 10120099.9
September 1990Good9 out of 10120099.9