Share: 
OSO VALLEY RD over SAN LUIS OBISPO CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+35.24300, -120.68093
35°14'35" N, 120°40'51" W
+35.24300, -120.68093
35°14'35" N, 120°40'51" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | OSO VALLEY RD over SAN LUIS OBISPO CREEK |
| Structure number: | 49C0401 |
| Location: | 0.1 MI E SR 101 |
| Purpose: | Carries highway and pedestrian walkway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Arterial (Urban) [16] |
| Length of largest span: | 38.4 ft. [11.7 m] |
| Total length: | 122.1 ft. [37.2 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 75.5 ft. [23.0 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 103.0 ft. [31.4 m] |
| Owner: | City or Municipal Highway Agency [04] |
| Year built: | 1987 |
| Year reconstructed: | 2015 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
| Number of main spans: | 3 |
| Main spans material: | Steel [3] |
| Main spans design: | Arch - Deck [11] |
| Deck type: | Not applicable [N] |
Latest Available Inspection: September 2018
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Good |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 19,452 [as of 2009] |
| Truck traffic: | 4% of total traffic |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Banks are protected or well vegetated. River control devices such as spur dikes and embankment protection are not required or are in a stable condition. [8] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 93.4 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| September 2018 | Good | - | Good | Good | 19452 | 93.4 |
| October 2016 | Good | - | Good | Good | 19452 | 93.4 |
| October 2014 | Good | - | Good | Good | 19452 | 88.2 |
| April 2013 | Good | - | - | - | 19452 | 93.4 |
| February 2011 | Good | - | - | - | 19452 | 93.4 |
| December 2008 | Good | - | - | - | 2000 | 97.5 |
| October 2004 | Good | - | - | - | 2000 | 97.5 |
| October 2002 | - | - | - | - | 2000 | 97.5 |
| September 2001 | - | - | - | - | 2000 | 97.5 |
| August 2000 | - | - | - | - | 2000 | 97.5 |
| April 1998 | - | - | - | - | 2000 | 97.5 |
| April 1996 | Good | - | - | - | 2000 | 82.5 |
| February 1994 | Good | - | - | - | 2000 | 82.5 |
| April 1992 | Good | - | - | - | 2000 | 97.6 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1052340
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1052340