Share:

PICACHO RD over YUMA MAIN CANAL

Map

Coordinates:
+32.73585, -114.62422
32°44'09" N, 114°37'27" W

Facts

Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name:PICACHO RD over YUMA MAIN CANAL
Structure number:58C0028
Location:0.16M E/O WINTERHAVEN RD
Purpose:Carries highway over waterway
Route classification:Collector (Urban) [17]
Length of largest span:19.0 ft. [5.8 m]
Total length:132.9 ft. [40.5 m]
Roadway width between curbs:26.2 ft. [8.0 m]
Deck width edge-to-edge:29.5 ft. [9.0 m]
Owner:County Highway Agency [02]
Year built:1925
Year reconstructed:1947
Historic significance:Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5]
Number of main spans:7
Main spans material:Wood or timber [7]
Main spans design:Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02]
Deck type:Concrete Cast-in-Place [1]
Wearing surface:Bituminous [6]

Latest Available Inspection: November 2017

Good/Fair/Poor Condition:Poor
Status:Open, no restriction [A]
Average daily traffic:6,500 [as of 2016]
Truck traffic:1% of total traffic
Deck condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Superstructure condition:Good [7 out of 9]
Substructure condition:Poor [4 out of 9]
Structural appraisal:Meets minimum tolerable limits to be left in place as is [4]
Deck geometry appraisal:Basically intolerable requiring high priority of replacement [2]
Water adequacy appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Roadway alignment appraisal:Equal to present desirable criteria [8]
Channel protection:Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6]
Scour condition:Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5]
Sufficiency rating:32.8
Recommended work:Bridge rehabilitation because of general structure deterioration or inadequate strength. [35]
Estimated cost of work:$621,000

Previous Inspections

DateConditionDeckSuperstructureSubstructureADTSuff. Rating
November 2017PoorGoodGoodPoor650032.8
March 2016FairGoodGoodFair650049.3
March 2014FairSatisfactoryGoodSatisfactory600056.9
March 2012FairSatisfactoryGoodGood600056.9
March 2010FairSatisfactoryGoodGood500059.5
January 2008FairSatisfactoryGoodGood500059.8
January 2006GoodGoodGoodGood400053.9
December 2004GoodGoodGoodGood400053.9
December 2002GoodGoodGoodGood400053.9
October 2000GoodGoodGoodGood400053.9
January 1996GoodGoodGoodGood400053.9
April 1995FairSatisfactoryFairFair400046.2
October 1992FairSatisfactoryFairFair400049.9
October 1990FairSatisfactoryFairFair400049.9