COUNTY LANE 15 over BOB CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+38.18844, -103.8036738°11'18" N, 103°48'13" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
Name: | COUNTY LANE 15 over BOB CREEK |
Structure number: | CRCO 1.10-23A |
Location: | JUST S OF ROAD E.25 |
Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
Route classification: | Local (Rural) [09] |
Length of largest span: | 57.1 ft. [17.4 m] |
Total length: | 61.0 ft. [18.6 m] |
Roadway width between curbs: | 27.9 ft. [8.5 m] |
Deck width edge-to-edge: | 30.5 ft. [9.3 m] |
Skew angle: | 20° |
Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
Year built: | 1993 |
Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
Design load: | MS 18 / HS 20 [5] |
Main span material: | Steel [3] |
Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
Wearing surface: | Monolithic Concrete (concurrently placed with structural deck) [1] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2017
Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
Average daily traffic: | 51 [as of 2013] |
Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Superstructure condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
Structural appraisal: | Equal to present minimum criteria [6] |
Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
Water adequacy appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
Channel protection: | Bank is beginning to slump. River control devices and embankment protection have widespread minor damage. There is minor stream bed movement evident. Debris is restricting the channel slightly. [6] |
Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for the assessed or calculated scour condition. [8] |
Sufficiency rating: | 98.3 |
Previous Inspections
Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
---|
January 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Satisfactory | Good | 51 | 98.3 |
January 2015 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 51 | 98.3 |
January 2013 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 84 | 98.3 |
January 2011 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 84 | 99.3 |
January 2009 | Good | Good | Good | Good | 98 | 99.3 |
December 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 98 | 99.3 |
October 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 98 | 99.3 |
February 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 98 | 98.7 |
May 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 27 | 98.6 |
February 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 27 | 98.6 |
February 1997 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 27 | 98.6 |
November 1995 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 50 | 98.5 |
July 1993 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 50 | 99.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
---|
Superstructure |
Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 428 | 0 | 428 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 428 | 0 | 428 | 0 | 0 |
Deck |
Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 1,864 | 1,309 | 380 | 175 | 0 |
Substructure |
Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 65 | 62 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
Bridge Rail |
Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 122 | 122 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 122 | 122 | 0 | 0 | 0 |