Share: 
COUNTY LANE 12 over BOB CREEK
Map
Coordinates:
+38.21840, -103.85756
38°13'06" N, 103°51'27" W
+38.21840, -103.85756
38°13'06" N, 103°51'27" W
Facts
Source: National Bridge Inventory. Information not verified; use at your own risk.
| Name: | COUNTY LANE 12 over BOB CREEK |
| Structure number: | CRCO 1.80-9A |
| Location: | .3 MI N OF ROAD G |
| Purpose: | Carries highway over waterway |
| Route classification: | Minor Collector (Rural) [08] |
| Length of largest span: | 56.8 ft. [17.3 m] |
| Total length: | 61.0 ft. [18.6 m] |
| Roadway width between curbs: | 28.2 ft. [8.6 m] |
| Deck width edge-to-edge: | 30.5 ft. [9.3 m] |
| Skew angle: | 20° |
| Owner: | County Highway Agency [02] |
| Year built: | 1994 |
| Historic significance: | Bridge is not eligible for the National Register of Historic Places [5] |
| Design load: | MS 18+Mod / HS 20+Mod [6] |
| Main span material: | Steel [3] |
| Main span design: | Stringer/Multi-beam or girder [02] |
| Deck type: | Concrete Cast-in-Place [1] |
| Wearing surface: | Bituminous [6] |
Latest Available Inspection: January 2017
| Good/Fair/Poor Condition: | Fair |
| Status: | Open, no restriction [A] |
| Average daily traffic: | 94 [as of 2013] |
| Deck condition: | Satisfactory [6 out of 9] |
| Superstructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Substructure condition: | Good [7 out of 9] |
| Structural appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Deck geometry appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Water adequacy appraisal: | Better than present minimum criteria [7] |
| Roadway alignment appraisal: | Equal to present desirable criteria [8] |
| Channel protection: | Bank protection is being eroded. River control devices and/or embankment have major damage. Trees and rush restrict the channel. [5] |
| Scour condition: | Bridge foundations determined to be stable for assessed or calculated scour condition. [5] |
| Sufficiency rating: | 99.0 |
Previous Inspections
| Date | Condition | Deck | Superstructure | Substructure | ADT | Suff. Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| January 2017 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 94 | 99.0 |
| January 2015 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 94 | 99.0 |
| January 2013 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 95 | 99.0 |
| January 2011 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 95 | 99.0 |
| January 2009 | Fair | Satisfactory | Good | Good | 127 | 98.0 |
| December 2006 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 127 | 99.0 |
| October 2004 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 127 | 100.0 |
| February 2003 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 127 | 100.0 |
| May 2001 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 127 | 100.0 |
| February 1999 | Good | Good | Good | Very Good | 127 | 100.0 |
| February 1997 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 127 | 100.0 |
| December 1995 | Good | Very Good | Very Good | Very Good | 113 | 100.0 |
| April 1994 | Good | Excellent | Excellent | Excellent | 113 | 100.0 |
Element Data
Source: National Bridge Elements dataset, 2019 edition. This feature is experimental.
| Element | Units | Quantity | 1-Good | 2-Fair | 3-Poor | 4-Serious |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Superstructure | ||||||
| Steel Girder/Beam | linear ft. | 428 | 294 | 114 | 20 | 0 |
| Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 428 | 314 | 114 | 0 | 0 |
| Deck | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Deck | sq. ft. | 1,866 | 1,756 | 70 | 40 | 0 |
| Wearing Surfaces | sq. ft. | 1,805 | 1,805 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Substructure | ||||||
| Reinforced Concrete Abutment | linear ft. | 65 | 64 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Bridge Rail | ||||||
| Steel or Aluminum Bridge Rail | linear ft. | 122 | 0 | 122 | 0 | 0 |
| Steel Protective Coating | sq. ft. | 122 | 0 | 61 | 61 | 0 |
© Copyright 2012-20, James Baughn
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1065360
Disclaimer: All data is taken from the National Bridge Inventory and has not been verified.
This page's URL is http://bridgereports.com/1065360